2google  a7309011  a9812213  addic  action  bymonth  bywords  commu  confl  conte  contr  critics  essaystr  find  finder
finduse   integ   keywords   likelink  love  peakoil  peopl  perso  recent  scien  scr-q25 scr-x95 lotview  value  webedit

CENTER --- This web page was last edited on November 14th, 2009 --- HOME






When evaluating any criticisms, ask yourself:


1.  What are the critics' own: motives, standards-for-self-evaluation, attitudes, 
assumptions, strengths, weaknesses, best-affirmations, virtues, vices, talents, greatest-
admirers, creative-contributions, purposes-in-life, most-frequent-negations, points of 
greatest-vulnerability?  
 
2.  What could some thoughtful and honest responses to these question REVEAL? 

3.  Are critics shifting attention from important concerns, to less important ones?

4.  Below  are offered some imperfect-criticisms of essays.  How might they be improved? 

5.  Each underlined text below is a clickable link to a full web page!  Which of them best fit you?

6.  Where have you found descriptions which are more open, honest, accurate and reliable about the realities described here?

NARROWLY  FOCUSED
TABOO POLITICAL TOPICS
LIBERAL BIASED AND IRREVERENT
EXESSIVE  REPITITIOUS AND REDUNDANT
PERSONAL VERSUS PRINCIPLED CRITICISMS
PERSONAL DEFEAT VERSUS PRINCIPLED COOPERATION
=> ESSAYS RARELY ADDRESS NOTABLE ISSUES DIRECTLY <=
==> ESSAYS LACK THE PROFESSIONAL POLISH OF GOOD WRITING <==
UN-SCIENTIFIC  NON-SCHOLARLY  and  UN-SUBSTANTIATED
=> ESSAYS ARE EXCESSIVELY ABSTRACT, RATHER THAN PERSONAL <=
=> ESSAYS OFFER NO SYSTEMATIC OR COHERENT THOUGHT-PATTERN <=
Shalom Essays ARE NOT RELIABLY TRUE AND  AUTHORITATIVE
ESSAYS ARE NOT WELL ORGANIZED IN AN OVERALL COHERENT WAY
ESSAYS FAIL TO ADDRESS MANY IMPORTANT CONTOVERSIAL ISSUES
=> ESSAYS DEFICIENT. THEY DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY SCHOLARLY BASES <=
===> ESSAYS RARELY HELP US IDENTIFY EVIL PEOPLE OR GROUPS FOR ATTACK <===
=> Essays were MOTIVATED BY CONFLICTS OVER POWER, WEALTH and PRESTIEGE <=
=>  THERE ARE NO CLEAR PLANS FOR ACHIEVING ANY WELL DEFINED ULTIMATE GOALS <=
=>  ESSAYS DESCRIBE INACCESSIBLE UTOPIAN RELATIONSHIPS --- BUT NO TRANSITIONS <=
About unusual Amish forgiveness-reconciliation-healing after girls were killed in an Amish school
Critics of visitors who have lifted up the essays reported in lotview.htm need to ask themselves:
=> ESSAYS DO NOT COMPORT WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUTHORITIES' VIEWS <=
INDEPENDENT  NON-CONFORMIST  UNDISCIPLINED  REBELIOUS
=> ENDLESSLY DISCUSSES, BUT AVOIDS TAKING ANY STAND <=
UNDERMINING  ESSENTIAL CONTROLS AND DOMINATION
NON-SCRIPTURAL PRETENTIOUS ARROGANT
NO LEGITIMACY AUTHORITY AUTHENTICITY
CONFLICT RESOLUTION FOUNDATIONS
COMPLEXITY AND ABSTRACTIONS
=> AVOIDS TAKING ANY STAND <=
EXCESSIVE  NUMBER
FEW BEST ESSAYS
EVASIVE

CENTER --- critics.htm  ---   HOME