If that is the case, it may be helpful to ask how well the most frequently read essays are helping their readers deal with how-well generally-accepted-authoritative-statements --- comport with their readers'-own-personal-experiences?

It may be time to discuss how-authoritative --- the readers' own-personal-experiences should-be-regarded; i.e., in-what-ways shall the readers'-own-personal-experiences be-regarded as-authoritative --- and-for-whom?

Should the essays which are most-often-being-read --- be viewed as meriting more-extended-discussions in-the- light of their readers'-own-personal-experiences? If not, why not? In this matter, whose views matter most?

Are there circumstances where gracious-open-and-honest-discussions of the most frequently read essays --- should be inhibited? If so, when, where and why? Who should provide the inhibitions? Why?

CENTER --- critics.htm --- HOME