It is reasonable to ask whether there is an excessive number of essays. --- Sometimes less is better.

Would it have been right to refuse to write down new insights --- from diverse perspective --- regarding more and more and more tragic situations and relationships?

Would it have been helpful to refuse to articulate insights which might help others deal with tragic traditions which have been maintained for centuries?

Would it have been helpful to have withheld or edited essays to make the whole of them more palitable to domineering people; to make it easier to get them published in more traditional ways?

What are the motivations of people who wish to suppress and/or repress diverse descriptions which are offered with no intent to coerce or violate other people's diverse kinds of integrities?

Major efforts have been made to help potential readers to find and read only those essays likely to be of interest to them. There is no need to read the set of essays in any fixed order from beginning to end, as with traditional books. Doing that is not likely to be helpful to anybody!

CENTER --- critics.htm --- HOME