===================================================================
Critics of the visitors who have lifted up the essays reported in trio, need to ask themselves:
===================================================================
Why have those particular essays been visited by so many visitors? Is it because those visitors ARE:
Living in different contexts, situations and/or communities?
Endowed with significantly different heriditary DNA structures?
Products of different: cultures, professions, religions, educational-trainings, vocations, etc.
Committed to different spectrums of ideals, values and principles?
Committed to different goals, plans, intentions and hopes in life?
Misinformed, confused, mislead, and/or in some other way --- are "strange"?
"Out of touch with reality"; e.g., are not well informed "realists"?
Naiev and need to deal with the world in a more pragmatic way?
Provincialists who are unaware of the full range of humane possibilities?
Unaware of their duties and responsibilities --- within their own demanding communities?
Not loyal supporters of their own particular culture, religion, profession, state or nation?
=========================================================================
What can we conclude? <========> On the basis of what evidence openly and honestly discussed?