That may be true. But the writer is very familiar with well systematized thought patterns within Mathematics, Physics, Astronomy, Parliamentary-Rules, Constitutions, Political Organizations and Presbyterian-Church-Polity. Compared to most people, he is an expert with notable, demostrated, respected and trusted authority in all of those areas. Then why is there no carry-over to these essays? Why is there no traditional Table-of-Contents! There is no traditional Index! There are no traditional footnotes to give credit where credit is due! There seems to have been no global plan in preparing for the work of writing! There is no evident outline or backbone!

Visitors need to expect an approach in essays that is not constrained by traditional formal patterns that have long demonstrated that they are not likely to become effective very soon. There already exist examples of complementary presentations. Here the writer is experimenting with yet other possibilities in a very public way. The essays are lightly edited experimental circuitous-trains-of-consciousnes.

There is some work being done here on helping visitors to discern how to perceive a coherent whole that is related to helpful insights that can be found in the essays --- and then present their perceived coherent whole in a coherent way which is helpful to others in resolving tragic cases of: alienation, estrangement, polarization, dichotimization, contentiousness, misunderstanding, arrogance, hubris, and related dilemmas. Visitors are encouragged to join the effort in their own coherent ways!

With some effort visitors can search with the help of 2google.htm
for essays which are relevant to some of the issues which are raised above.

CENTER --- critics.htm  ---   HOME