blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/a9811111.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %QUALITY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS APPROACH DISCERN+981111 %APPROACH EXPECT SEEK FLAWS ERRORS VULNERABILITY+981111 %PERSONAL COMMUNAL INTEGRITY SECURITY CONTROLS 981111 The quality of people's inter-personal relationships flow from their attitudes toward each other --- and how they approach each other in contrasting ways. 1. Seeking to discover and take advantage of each other's points of vulnerability; e.g., weaknesses, errors, mistakes, ignorance, confusion, imperfections, etc. 2. Seeking to discover and expand common ground in experiences, interests, desires, hopes, perceptions, aspirations, beliefs, etc. 3. Seeking to prove each other inferior, wrong, imperfect, disloyal, unfaithful, unreliable, dishonest, etc. 4. Seeking to discover the ways and senses in which each other is: creative, right, helpful, loyal, faithful, reliable, accurate, descriptive, perceptive, etc. People who approach each other in manners which are negative, destructive, disintegrative, contentious, coercive, combative, etc. --- usually are successful in proving that there were good grounds for approaching each other in those chosen ways. They cooperate in creating the circumstances which justify their manners of approach ---and suffer the consequences of both personal and communal disintegration. People who approach each other in manners which are positive, constructive, integrative, reconciling, gentle, cooperative, etc. --- usually are successful in proving that there were good grounds for approaching each other in those ways. They cooperate in creating the circumstances which justify their manners of approach --- and enjoy both personal and communal integrity and integration. In light of the systemic bias which is pointed to above in instances of the two contrasting manners of approach --- it is clear that demonstrations that one's own manner of approach leads to an apparent confirmation that there were good grounds for approaching each other in the chosen manner --- are not themselves good grounds for regarding oneself as more "righteous" than those who chose other grounds. Drawing such conclusions engenders disintegrative developments --- no matter who draws such conclusions about their own particular manner of approach. The central issue is not who is justified in proving that their manner of approach is "superior", "better", "God's", "scriptural", or "best". The central issue is discerning and learning to live in ways which promote both personal and communal integration and integrity. That is not done while one is seeking to be "superior", "better", "God's chosen", or "best". (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================