This-essay is a7907172.htm which is available at the web-site www.essayz.com. See more notes at the bottom. Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay By-Months By-Years By-Words Webs of Like-&-Un-Like ESSAYS <==> Like-&-UN-Like This-One ========================================================== %LOVING COERCIVE HELP LEGITIMATE CONSTRAINTS REWARD+790717 %PUNISH IMPRISON COOPERATIVE RIGHT TO INTERFERE 790717 When do the members of a society have the right to coerce a non-conformist member of their society? When is a person's behavior (or anticipated behavior) of such a nature that others may properly seek to manipulate that person so as to modify behavior? Must there be objective damage already done? Must there be demonstrable financial, property, or bodily damage/loss? Is it enough that there is emotional disturbance created by the objectionable behavior? Who owns the problem when there is emotional disturbance occasioned by non-conformist behavior? When is the emotional disturbance occasioned sufficiently serious so that coercion is warranted? Should the writing or speaking of an unconventional theory be prohibited---because it causes great emotional problems to members of the society whose world view is threatened by the unconventional theory? Shall the challenging of the elitist power structure which is generally accepted by all members of a community---be prohibited because it will cause great emotional distress to members at all levels of the comfortable power structure? People are comfortable with known places in pecking orders. To upset a pecking order can cause distress even to those who are comfortably on the bottom! Should it be illegal to challenge unjust pecking orders? People are greatly disturbed when their collusions are challenged! Should laws protect the respectable collusions of a society? Should all forms of communication which challenge collusions be forbidden? Should thought be controlled? Should emotions be controlled, or merely the expression of emotions? Should thoughts be controlled, or merely the expression of thoughts? How are we to tell wether or not laws which inhibit specific types of behavior are serving the public welfare, or just protecting some conventional collusions? How are we to tell if taboos are serving the public welfare, or protecting collusions? Should it be legal to protect collusions? Should citizens have the right to challenge collusions? Should citizens have the right to think, feel and express their thoughts and feelings without social constraints? When is it an expression of love for members of a society to cooperatively coerce non-conformists in the society? (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in www.essayz.com Search for Integrity and Honesty (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================
Lines beginning with a percent sign are KEYWORDS for use in ESSAY-System Searches. Their terminal digits are dates of writing in the format @yymmdd#, where @ = a means 99, @ = b means 20, and # = is a within-date essay-count. Links to date-adjacent essays are near page top & bottom.
Find the following links by clicking on CENTER when CENTER near the top or bottom of a web page of essayz.com 1. Go to HOME PAGE of essayz.com 2. Find brief-essays via keywords 3. Find brief-essay about ADDICTION 4. Search-Helps related to ABOVE-LINK 5. GoTo Action & Information Center 6. Find Regular-Essays via Year/Month 7. Find Regular-Essays via Word-Starts 8. Find Regular-Essay about LOVE
This-essay is a7907172.htm which is available at the web-site www.essayz.com. These 5 lines echo top lines. Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay By-Months By-Years By-Words Webs of Like-&-Un-Like ESSAYS <==> Like-&-UN-Like This-One