blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/b0503061.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ==========================================================

=====> See what editing of this essay will come later. <======

%AVOIDING PATTERNS BEHAVIORS INHERENTLY NATURALLY 050306 %RESPECT HONOR SUPPORT REVERENCE DOMINEER DOMINATED 050306 %INTEGRATIONS INTEGRITIES HEALTH SHALOM COHERENCE 050306 %EXCLUSIVE RECLUSIVE BANISH REJECT PURIFY PURITY 050306 %TRUE-LOVERS LETTING GO GRACIOUS AFFIRMATION OPENED 050306 %INVULNERABLE SECURITY FORTRESS SANCTUARY CASTLE IT 050306 Which pattern of behaviors is inherently/naturally more worthy of admiration, respect, honor, support and reverence: 1. Domineering-Peoples' successes in avoiding becoming involved in Letting-Go of their elaborate and unilateral defenses against: openness, honesty, mutuality, balance, and prudent-but-risky-vulnerability? OR 2. True-Lover's efforts to avoid Letting-Go of their gracious affirmations of: openness, honesty, mutuality, balance, and prudent-but-risk-vulnerability? What is the historic-evidence about the fruits of each of the two tragically-contrasting patterns of behaviors? What are the conclusions of systems-analyses of the ways in which traditional-vices lead to tragic-fruits? What are the effects on both personal-and-communal integrations-and-integrities. What are the conclusions of systems-analyses of the ways in which traditional-virtues lead to sweet-fruits? What are the effects on both personal-and-communal integrations-and-integrities. Does it make any difference in drawing a conclusion whether the systems-analyses are conducted by True-Lovers or by Domineering-People? Why might different conclusions be drawn? Which process is more likely to demonstrate coherence and integrity? What kinds of realities and relationships can we systematically avoid while maintaining both our personal- and-communal integrations-and-integrities? Why so? What kinds of realities and relationships can we NOT systematically avoid while maintaining both our personal- and -communal integrations-and-integrities? Why so? What traditional methodology, science, paradigm, or belief system is most helpful in responding to the above kinds of questions, and to the issues which they point toward? How can we most helpfully share our conclusions? (c) 2004 by Paul A. Smith in "Search for Honesty and Integrity" (On Being Yourself Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================