This is http://www.essayz.com/b0410101.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ===============================================================> See what editing of this essay will come later. <======
%GOD TALKERS THEOLOGIANS DEFINE CONCEIVE EVIL BEING 041010 %EQUAL EMPHASIS EXCLUSIVE ALIENATION NEIGHBORS SINS 041010 %COMMUNITY COMMITTMENT INTEGRATIONS INTEGRITIES SEX 041010 %BEING TOGTHER FRIENDS OPEN HONEST DIALOGUE TRUTHS 041010 %DOMINEERING CONTROL POWER CONCENTRATE POLARIZED 041010 %BINARY DICHOTOMY PROPER IDEAL FORMULAS TRADITIONS 041010 Often theologians (God talkers) define "evil" as being essentially and primarily about "alienation from God". Such theologians often fail to place an equal emphasis upon alienation from: neighbors, communities, self, committments to human integrations and integrities, etc. --- as well as upon human alienations from God. Why do some people put the primary and/or the whole emphasis upon alienation from God alone? Might such theologians be domineering people who are preoccupied with issues of: control, power-concentrations, polarizations, binary-thinking, dichotomization, etc. Might they be focusing upon the concentration of all power into the hands of "their" God --- who is conceived by them as all-powerful? By conceiving and/or definining "evil" as being essentially and primarily about "alienation from God-the-all-powerful" --- they can justify the myth of redemptive violence in terms of which they can then conveniently "justify" their unilateral destruction of evil-people who threaten "their all-powerful-God" --- who needs their help to defend Himself. The more domineering a Man is --- the more insecure and in the need of the assistance of a powerful Man-Made coalition the Man is. It follows that The Most Powerful Man --- who has been made in the image of insecure domineering Men, by them --- will be Angry and Insecure; needing the help of a coalition of such powerful Men --- who have defined "evil" in terms of not-conforming to the Will of their Angry God, who has been projected up into the heavens with their own: anger, domineering tendencies, and need for a coalition of supporters --- to eliminate evil, by eliminating evil people, who are creative-non-conformists. If the above does not make sense, that should NOT come as a supprise. Domineering Men rarely make sense in any reasonable way as they are rationalizing how they feel and "think". The above irrational rambling reveals some of the patterns of "thought" of domineering "God talkers" who conceive and/or define evil in ways which make it easy for them to be led by The Myth of Redemptive Violence in their efforts to eliminate evil-people who are perceived as threatening their ability to be in-control. It is helpful to engage in communal practices, "rituals", which clarify what steps need to be taken to understand, transcend and subvert "The Domination System", "The Myth of Redemptive Violence", "Collusions", addictions, codependent-supporters, "Power Concentrationsn", etc. It is not helpful to focus upon communal practices, "rituals" which are Not-Clear-About what steps need to be taken to understand, transcend and subvert "The Domination System", "The Myth of Redemptive Violence", "Collusions", addictions, codependent-supporters, "Power Concentra- tions", etc. --- and in fact may empower domineering people to play their power-play-games through lack of clarity. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================