This is http://www.essayz.com/b0410091.htm         
Previous-Essay      <== This-Essay ==>     Following-Essay
Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words.
{Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.}
==========================================================
       =====>   See what editing of this essay will come later.  <======

 %DIFFERENCE RELIABLE CONCEPT DUBIOUS CERTAINTY GOD 041009
 %HUMILITY SHAKEN FOUNDATIONS BIASED MISLEADING SIN 041009
  %CONVICTIONS DOCTRINES FOUNDATIONS HOPE INTEGRITY 041009
 %RELIABLE INDIVIDUAL COMMUNITY SANCTUARY INSTITUTE 041009
  %GROUP THINK TRUSTED OXYMORON WORD PAIRS CONCEPTS 041009
  %DOMINANT BULLY KINGS DICTATOR EMPEROR PRESIDENTS 041009

     How are we to know the difference between  "reliable-
concepts" and "dubious-concepts" among the following?

     1.  "Foundations-for-certainty",
     2.  "Foundations-for-humility",
     3.  "Shanken-foundations",
     4.  "Shaking-foundations",
     5.  "Biased-foundations",
     6.  "Biased-attitudes",
     7.  "Misleading-convictions",
     8.  "Misleading-doctrines",
     9.  "Sound-doctrines",
    10.  "Foundations-for-hope",
    11.  "Grounds-for-hope",
    12.  "Reliable-individuals",
    13.  "Reliable-institutions,
    14.  "Reliable-group-think",
    15.  "Collusive-group-think",
    16.  "Collusions",
    17.  "Foundations-for-perfection",
    18.  "Integrative-Resistance",
    19.  "Integrative-Violence"
    20.  "Integrative-Coercion"
    21.  "Integrative-Myth"
    22.  "Reliable-Myth"
    23.  "True-Oxymoron"
    24.  "Profound-Simplicity"
    25.  "Essential-Complexity"
    26.  "Unavoidable-Complexity"
    27.  "Unessential-Complexity"
    28.  "Profound-Simplicity"
    29.  "Misleading-Self-Confidence"
    30.  "Respected-Bully"
    31.  "Trusted-Collusion"
    32.  "Trusted-Oxymoron"
    33.  "Trusted-Naked-King"
    34.  "Absurd-Combinations"
    35.  "Profound-Integrations"
    36.  "Embarrassing-Combinations"

     People's points of vulnerability are often of one  of
the following kinds:

 1.  Respecting incoherent-combinations of concepts.
 2.  Respecting statements which are not true.
 3.  Presenting false statements which are not true.
 4.  Clearly trying to mislead others' beliefs.
 5.  Believing mutually contradicory statements.
 6.  Believing domineering people's statements.
 7.  Trusting coercive people.
 8.  Internalizing incoherent beliefs and doctrines.
 9.  Lacking internal personal integrity/authenticity.
10.  Associating with incoherent cliques/gangs.
11.  Respecting incoherent cliques/gangs.
12.  Not-respecting  balance,   authenticity,   mutuality.
13.  Hoping  for  salvation  through  domination/coercion.
14.  Not  recognizing  manipulations  of   partial-truths.
15.  Not being suspicious of domineering people.
16.  Not suspecting extreme concentrations of power.
17.  Naievly trusting exceedingly "powerful" people.
18.  Trusting superficial analyses of complex relations.
19.  Being personally out-of-balance within relations.
20.  Not perceiving domination and coercion as such.
21.  Tolerating domination and coercion as respectable.

                                                                                                                               
                         (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in      
                    (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy)  
                                                                                                                               
==========================================================