This is http://www.essayz.com/b0406282.htm         
Previous-Essay      <== This-Essay ==>     Following-Essay
Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words.
{Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.}
==========================================================
       =====>   See what editing of this essay will come later.  <======

   %KINDS RELATIONSHIPS DIFFERENT SETS PEOPLE GROUP 040628
   %DISHONEST PRETEND IMPOSSIBE PROHIBITED STANDARD 040628
 %CULTURAL HERITAGE RELIGIOUS EDUCATE ECONOMIC WORK 040628
%WAR MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX GENETIC PEACE LOVE 040628
%SEXUAL INTIMACY FRIENDS DISEASE POLITICAL LANGUAGE 040628
 %SIMPLISTIC FUNDAMENTALS COMPLEMENTARY INTEGRITIES 040628

      The  kinds  of  relationships which  different  sets
people  can form --- depend significantly upon differences
between one set of people and another set of people. It is
dishonest   to  pretend  and  act  as  if  there  are   no
differences  in the kinds of relationships which different
sets of people can form.   Thus it is dishonest to pretend
that it makes sense to prescribe and/or proscribe in  some
standard way ---  what kinds  of  relationships  different
sets of people can and/or may form.

      The  differences  between different sets  of  people
often pertain to such factors as:

      1.  Cultural heritages.
      2.  Religious heritages.
      3.  Educational heritages.
      4.  Economic heritages.
      5.  Work heritages.
      6.  Addictive/Codependent heritages.
      7.  War heritages.
      8.  Military-service heritages.
      9.  Peacemaking heritages.
     10.  Genetic differences.
     11.  Disease-generated differences.
     12.  Traumatic experience differences.
     13.  Political heritages.
     14.  Professional background differences.

      People   who   try  to  determine  what   kinds   of
relationships  different  sets  of  people  may  form  ---
without  giving  careful considerations to the  above  and
additional  differences ---  thereby demonstrate a  tragic
and pathetic lack of integrity  and contribute to a tragic
decrease  in personal  and  communal  integrities.    Such
peoples'   suggestions,   recommendations  and/or  demands
rarely merit respect,  honor or support.  They are usually
domineering  people,  and  it does nobody any good to deal
with  them  in domineering ways which  copy  their  tragic
mistakes and blunders.

      Each  community  needs  many  different:   kinds  of
people,  sets-of-people, and differing-relationships among
differing    sets-of-people.      Simplistic    unilateral
standards, rules and regulations which show no respect for
normal  human  differences  among healthy people  ---   do
nobody  any  real good.   The  essential  foundations  for
personal and communal integrities lead different kinds  of
people to contribute  to  the  building  up   of  overall-
helpful-sanctuaries,   personal integrities  and  communal
integrities   ---   without  being  dishonestly-simplistic
and/or domineering.
                                                                                                                               
                         (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in      
                    (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy)  
                                                                                                                               
==========================================================