This is http://www.essayz.com/b0103281.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %DOMINEERING PEOPLE DOMINATION SYSTEM OBJECTIONS+010328 %STANDING HURT THREATENED POWER ATTORNEY REPRESENT+010328 %PERSONAL COMMUNAL INTEGRITY BALANCE MUTUAL LOVE+010328 %MOTIVATIONS SYMBOLIC ACTIONS SHARE POWER INFLUENCE+010328 %NEGATIVE CRITICAL SACRIFICE AFFIRMATION PRIVACY 010328 When domineering people object to the behaviors of vulnerable people --- we will do well and be well if we ask the following kinds of questions, and welcome other complementary questions: 1. Do the objectors have solid grounds for claiming that they have "standing"; i.e., that they can show that they have been hurt or threatened, or that people for whom they have power-of-attorney have been hurt or threatened --- under widely accepted understandings of cause and effect? 2. Have the objectors in the past demonstrated a true concern for and interest in promoting both personal integrity and communal integrity --- in ways which demonstrate true: balance, personal integrity, mutual consideration, conflict-resolution benefiting many diverse people, etc? 3. Are the objectors people who are healthy and work to promote the physical and mental health of diverse other people? 4. What roles do fears play: (a) in the motivations of the objectors, and (b) in the lives of those upon whom they focus attention? 5. Are the objectors focusing upon symbolic actions; actions whose meanings they presume to control unilaterally --- in conflict with other people's understandings of the meanings of the actions? 6. Are the objectors familiar with the victims of their criticisms? Can the objectors accurately describe how their victims perceive the relationships between them --- to the satisfaction of those people whom they criticize? 7. Are the objectors known for how well they truly help many different people to share power in prudent/wise ways? 8. Apart from negative and critical statements --- what primary affirmations do the objectors make, and in what ways do they make such primary affirmations? Through words only, or through words and actions which demonstrate personal integrity? 9. What sacrifices have the objectors made in order to help promote physical, mental and spiritual well-being in the community as a whole? 10. Are the objectors prone towards participating in exclusive relationships and clubs, or towards promoting the integration of different people through dialogue leading to increased mutual understanding? (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================