This is http://www.essayz.com/b0508034.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %SYSTEMS ANALYSIS PERSONAL RELATIONS SCIENTISTS SEX 050803 %BIAS ABUSE PREJUDICE PRAGMATIC USES FEMALES GOOD 050803 %DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE RETRIBUTIVE PUNITIVE MORALITY 050803 %LEGALISTIC TECHNOCRATIC ETHICS GOOD EVIL TEMPT GOD 050803 %EXACT MEASUREMENT NUMBERS COMPUTATION POSSIBLE SIN 050803 %MANHATTAN PROJECT INVULNERABLE NUCLEAR BOMB ATOMS 050803 Exceptionally "Objective-Scientists" and "Objective- Scholars" detach themselves from the "Objects" and "Subjects" of their "Consideration" and "Reflection". Within the "Objective-Paradigm" it is Assumed-and- Believed that it is impossible to be "Personally-Involved" with the "Object/Subject" of "Personal-Consideration" and as the same time be: Unbiased, Honest, Coherent, Well- Integrated, Healthy, and Enjoying-Shalom. The "Objective-Paradigm" gained Great-Respect, Honor, Pragmatic-Support, Reverence, and Currency during the times of Arabic-Enlightenment, European- Enlightenment, European-Renaissance, Founding-of-Great-Universities, and the Evolution-of-Exact-Sciences --- based upon Objective- Systems-Analysis, Exact-Measurements, and Accurate- Computations, Accurate-Predictions and Military-Funding. It is difficult for Objective-Scientists to Honestly- Reflect upon the Great-Successes of their Objective- Paradigms, the Limitations-of-their-Objective-Paradigms, and the Exact-Nature of Unbiased-Foundations While-at-the- Same-Time: 1. Believing that it is impossible to Demonstrate- Integrity while "Personally-Involved" with the "Object/Subject" of "Personal-Consideration"; i.e., To- Reflect-With-Scientific-Integrity-Upon-Themselves-as- persons Working-Objectively-Within Intimate-Personal- Relationships. 2. Being-Unbiased about their own Successes-as- Objective-Scientists --- while understanding the Essential-Natures of their Own-Personal-Successes in Professional-Relationships --- which entail Intimate- Cooperation, Personal-Respect, Personal-Honors, Open-and- Honest-Dialogue, etc. 3. Being-Involved in Intimate-Sexual-Considerations and Sexual-Relationships which involve Intimate- Considerations of the Wonderful-Possibilities of being Well-Integrated with Attractive-Females about whom they FEEL that they must be: Objective, Unbiased, Detached, Making-Measurements, Carrying-out-Computations --- With- Integrity. 4. Excluding from their Successful-Professional- Relationships and Professional-Networks --- Brilliant- Females who are Sexually-Attractive-Distractive members of an Oppressed-Class whose members are Used-and-Abused as OBJECTS of Detached-Consideration for Pragmatic-Benefits- and-Gain. 5. Being-Unaware of what are the Essential- Foundations of Personal-and-Communal Integrations-and- Integrities as regards to: Open-and-Honest Intimacies-and- Dialogue in Collaborative-and-Cooperative Professional- Scientific-Objective-Work together within Sexually- Segregated-Professions. 6. Being-Unable to Honestly-Sort-Out the Essential- Differences between PERSONAL-RELATIONSHIPS which are In- VARIOUS-COMBINATIONS: Reliable, Trustworthy, Honorable, Unbiased, Objective, Abusive, Accurate, Exact, Precise, Integrative, Reproducible, Creative, Synergistic, Confirmable, Secretive, Honest, Private, Public, Prescriptive, Proscriptive, Descriptive, Legislated, Discovered, Legalistic, Moral, Ethical, Judgmental, Technocratic, Domineering, Coercive, Violent, Militaristic, Justifiable, Tolerated, etc. 7. Being-Disinterested in understanding and Talking- Honestly-and-Intimately about the Dynamics-of-Sexual- Relationships which are: Open, Honest, Integrative, Unbiased, Honorable and Healthy --- in contrast to the Dynamics-of-Sexual-Relationships which are: Secretive, Pretentious, Dis-Integrative, Biased, Prejudiced, Dis- Honorable, Dis-Eased, Diseased, Abusive, Addictive, Codependent, Coercive, Violent, and Destructive. 8. Being-Disinterested in engaging in Disciplined- Systems-Analyses of: Collusions, Addictions, Codependent- Relationships, Prejudice, Bias, Paradigms, Personal- Integrations, Personal-Integrities, Communal-Integrations, and Communal-Integrities. 9. Being-Disinterested in engaging in Disciplined- Systems-Analyses of Boundaries-Between: Sciences, Militarism, Religions, Technologies, Technocracies, Industrial-Complexes, Economics, Domination-Systems, Collusive-Games-of-Mutual-Self-Deception, Possible, Impossible, Spiritual, Objective, Subjective, Mental, Physiological, Chemical, Biological, and other Dynamic- Processes. 10. Being-Complicit within Communal-Collusive-Games- of-Mutual-Self-Deception about: a. Possibilities, b. Impossibilities, c. Redemptive-Coercion, d. Redemptive-Violence, e. Redemptive-Wars, f. Redemptive-Terrorism, g. Redemptive-Unilateral-Salvation, h. Redemptive-Sacrifices-of-the-Vulnerable, i. Redemptive-Concentrations of Powers/Wealth, j. Redemptive-Concentrations of Rights/Health, k. Redemptive-Powers-that-Be, l. Redemptive-Secrecy-and-Dishonesty, m. Redemptive-Objectivity-and-Sciences, n. Redemptive-Technologies-and-Technocracies, o. Redemptive-Large-Institutions, p. Redemptive-Addictions-and-Codependents, q. Absolute-Truths about Causes-and-Effects, r. Absolute-Truths about Dichotomous-Virtues, s. Absolute-Truths about Dichotomous-Vices, t. Absolute-Truths about Dichotomous-People, u. Absolute-Truths about Evil and Good People. What would happen if there was comprehensive sexual integration among professionals within the Exact-Sciences? Shalom is the Way-Out! Be-Together in Shalom! Keep in mind that to Be-Together in Shalom requires Letting-Go of Hopes-for-Salvation through: 1. Alienative Defenses-and/or-Technologies. 2. Invulnerability as the Key-to-Security. 3. Achievements and Possessions, 4. Beliefs, Doctrines, Rituals and/or Faith. 5. Institutional-Structures. 6. Proper-Forms-of-Conformity. 7. Proper Ideal-Forms for Proper-Relationships. 8. Proper-Forms-of-Exclusivity. 9. Proper: Proscriptions, Prescriptions, Taboos. 10. Proper: Judgements, Excommunications, etc. Within the Objective-Paradigm of Objective-Scientists there is no Reliable-Provision for Transcending-the- Limits-of-The Objective-Paradigm; i.e., the inherent Biases-Present within its Most-Fundamental: 1. Unexamined-Attitudes, 2. Unexamined-Assumptions, 3. Unexamined-Affective-Considerations, 4. Unexamined-Patterns-of-Emotional-Relationships, 5. Unexamined-Convictions, 6. Unexamined-Ideals-and-Values, 7. Unexamined-Ideal-Forms, 8. Unexamined-Collusions, 9. Unexamined-Conceptions-of-Impossibilities, 10. Unexamined-Conceptions-of-Certainties. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in "Search for Honesty and Integrity" (On Being Yourself Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================