This is http://www.essayz.com/b0407172.htm         
Previous-Essay      <== This-Essay ==>     Following-Essay
Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words.
{Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.}
==========================================================
 %UNTIE GORDIAN KNOT INSIDE OUTSIDE REJECT INCLUDED 040717
%UNITED COHERENT COOPERATE CONTEND COLABORATE JUDGE 040717
 %PERSONAL COMMUNAL REPRESSIONS DEPRESSION SUPPRESS 040717
%DISTINGUISH PRUDENT WISE CAUTION TRUE LOVERS FEARS 040717
 %RESPONSE INITIATIVE UNILATERAL DOMINATION COLLUDE 040717
%PUBLIC PRIVATE INTIMACIES SEXUALITY PLEASURES SINS 040717

     It  is  difficult to untie Gordian-Knots of  personal
and communal repressions because:

    1.  It  is  often  difficult to  distinguish  reliably
between   prudent  and  wise  cautions  on  our  part   as
integrative and free True-Lovers;   and fearful  responses
to   actions  which are unilaterally demanded  by   and/or
are

guided  by:   "The   Domination   System",   conspirators,
collusions, colluders,  addictions, addicts, codependents,
dictators, tyrants, emperors, etc.

    2.  It  is often difficult  to   distinguish  reliably
between:

        (a)  real-objective-physical-actions,
        (b)  intentional-planning-for-real-objective-
             physical-actions,
        (c)  accidental-day-dreams related to the above,
        (d)  repressed-day-dreams of the above kinds,
        (e)  guilt-ridden-day-dreams,
        (d)  individually-enjoyed-day-dreams,
        (e)  True-Lovers-Enjoying their day-dreams,
        (f)  True-Lovers-Fulfilling their day-dreams,
        (g)  Private and public differences in the above,
        (h)  Privately or publicly doing the above,
        (i)  Privately or publicly advocating the above,
        (j)  Privately/publicly prohibiting the above,
        (k)  Trying to police/enforce such prohibitions.
        (l)  The objectively possible and impossible.
        (m)  The reflexively possible and impossible.
        (n)  The legally possible and impossible.
        (o)  The spiritually possible and impossible.
        (p)  Integrative and disintegrative behaviors.

    So also it is hard to distinguish between:

    3.  True-Lovers'  integrative refusals to be dominated
in alienative ways;  and domineering-people'  demands that
"different-people"   conform  "properly"    in  alienative
ways.

    Or between:

    4.  "Clear  and  Present  Objective  Dangers"  and the
subjective fears of people who are domineering, paranoids,
mentally-ill, alienated, alienators, disconnected, out-of-
touch,   emotionally-immature,  excommunicated,  isolated,
etc.

    5.  We  are  prone to insist exclusively upon our  own
most-favored-way as regards formal-or-informal-procedures,
and definitions of: ideals, values,  virtues, vices, true-
paradoxes, idolatry, righteousness, conformity, integrity,
evil-relationships, evil-people, enemies, terrorists, etc.

    6.  In fear we are loath to honor  True-Lovers'-Rights
to privacy, intimacy, and Being-In-Love.

    7.  We confuse "The Domination System" with God.

                                                                                                                               
                         (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in      
                    (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy)  
                                                                                                                               
==========================================================