This is http://www.essayz.com/b0404301.htm         
Previous-Essay      <== This-Essay ==>     Following-Essay
Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words.
{Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.}
==========================================================
       =====>   See what editing of this essay will come later.  <======

%IMPROPER INTIMATE OPEN HONEST BALANCED MUTUAL SINS 040430
 %CIVIL HOSPITABLE GRACIOUS GENEROUS SHARING LOVERS 040430
%UNCONVENTIONAL CONFORMITY PROPRIETY FORMALITY GODS 040430
  %CRITERIA OUTSIDERS OUTSIDER PARTICIPANTS CRITICS 040430
%SEXUAL ABUSE DOMINATION SYSTEM FALLEN POWERS BEING 040430
%FRIENTLY TOGETHER PRIVACY RIGHTS RITUALS COLLUSION 040430

      By  what  criteria can outsiders to  a  relationship
which is:  open,  honest,  balanced,  mutual,  and entails
intimate  dialogue  ---  be able to show properly that the
intimate-relationship   is  "improper"   ---   if each  of
the  participants  in  the relationship say that it is   a
proper relationship because ALL of the following are true:

 1.  The relationship is mutual, open, honest & balanced.
 2.  Within it power and wealth are fairly shared.
 3.  Within it there is no coercion or violence.
 4.  Participants demonstrate personal integrity.
 5.  No participant is forced to conform in any way.
 6.  Participants are of legal age for intimacies.
 7.  No formal charges have been properly presented.
 8.  Within it no participant is domineering.
 9.  All participants are gentile, kind & patient.
10.  All participants are civil, healthy & gracious.

      Can  proper criteria by which such  a   relationship
is  shown   to   be   "improper"   require  that  we  call
attention  to  differences among the participants relating
to some of  the following?

  1.  Race,
  2.  City, State or Nationality,
  3.  Religious affiliation or beliefs,
  4.  Political affiliation or convictions,
  5.  Heritage,
  6.  Culture,
  7.  Education,
  8.  Location of birth,
  9.  Family wealth and power,
 10.  Sexuality?
 11.  Rights to not being embarrassed?
 12.  Rights to not admit being involved in mistakes?
 13.  Rights to being invulnerable at others' expense?
 14.  Rights to being dominant at others' expense?
 15.  Rights to luxuries enjoyed at others' expense?

      Can  any formal law by which such a relationship  is
shown  to  be  "improper"   ---   properly entail  calling
attention  to differences among the participants  relating
to ANY of  the above  aspects of the participants ---  and
the  law  still  be  in   keeping  with our  international
declarations of human rights?

                                                                                                                               
                         (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in      
                    (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy)  
                                                                                                                               
==========================================================