blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/b0403293.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ==========================================================

=====> See what editing of this essay will come later. <======

%WHEN AFFIRMATION DEGRADATIONS VALUES IDEALS GOODS 040329 %TABOO QUESTIONED PRINCIPLES RESPONSIVE LIMITED GOD 040329 %ULTIMATE CONCERN BEING PRESENT DICTATOR KING QUEEN 040329 %LORD FATHER MOTHER DOMINANT SYSTEMS ANALYSIS DEVIL 040329 %CONCENTRATED POWER UNCHECKED ABSOLUTE TRUTH LOVERS 040329 %EVIDENCE EXPERIENCE AUTHENTIC DESCRIPTION CAUSES 040329 When affirmations of values, ideals, principles, etc. come into question it is natural and proper to ask why the affirmations are questioned and/or affirmed. The responses may include, but are not limited to, the following kinds of responses: 1. The Dictator, King, Queen, Lord, Father, Mother, or some other Dominant-Person" or "Dominant-Coalition" SAID-SO! 2. Power corrupts and unchecked/absolute power corrupts absolutely. 3. There is reliable evidence that the affirmation (or the degradation of the affirmation) will lead to specified consequences --- which may be generally regarded as "good" or as "bad". 4. There is some generally accepted "belief", "doctrine", "natural-law", "coherent-theory", "ruling", or taboo that "indicates" that the affirmation (or the degradation of the affirmation) will lead to specified/implied consequences --- which may be generally regarded as "good" or as "bad". 5. ASSOCIATED with the affirmation (or its degradation) are people or other affirmations (or degradations) which are generally regarded as "good" or as "bad"; i.e., virtue or guilt-by-association; even though there may be no evidence of direct causation or participation in that which is judged negatively. 6. A thorough "systems-analysis" of a complex system of inter-acting and inter-related parts indicates that the affirmation (or degradation) is NOT truly defensible for the stated reasons based upon any evidence which is firm and is respected by well-informed and well-integrated persons and/or groups of persons. When affirmations or degradations come into question we need to ask why they should be regarded as "good" or "bad" with the above kinds of considerations kept clearly in mind by those who are involved. In the absence of such intentional care --- domineering people become more powerful in corrupt ways. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================