This is http://www.essayz.com/b0401283.htm         
Previous-Essay      <== This-Essay ==>     Following-Essay
Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words.
{Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.}
==========================================================
 %SORT OUT IDENTIFY CONFIRM TEST EXPERIMENT DISCERN 040128
%UNDERSTAND PROOF AUTHORITY ARTICULATE DESCRIBE GOD 040128
%ARROGANCE SELF RIGHTEOUSNESS DISEASE ILLNESS PRION 040128
  %BACTERIA VIRUS MOULD SCIENCE OBJECTIVE REFLEXIVE 040128
%EVIDENCE COORELETION CAUSE EFFFECT AFFECT EMOTIONS 040128
%DOMINATIONS CONTROLS COERCION VIOLENCE ALIENATIONS 040128
     
     It   is  generally difficult to sort out the  origins  
of dis-ease,   disease,  and illness ---   when there does  
not   already      exist     scientifically      confirmed   
objective-connections   between   some  well   identified: 
bacteria,  virus, prion, mould, pollen, etc.  ---  and the 
course  of  symptoms of the disease.    The difficulty  is 
especially great when the  symptoms of dis-ease,   disease 
or  illness  are  of  the kinds which usually  pertain  to 
mental-diseases. 

     The  difficulties are almost insurmountable when  the 
dis-ease,   disease  or  illness  is  being  triggered  or 
augmented   by   the  behaviors  of  domineering   people, 
controllers, manipulators, threats of violence, threats of 
excommunication,  etc. ---  and those who are presuming to 
treat  the dis-ease,  disease or illness include those who 
triggered and/or augmented that which they are "treating". 
     
     In  the presence  of  domineering  "doctors"  who are 
arrogant,  pretentious,  and/or self-righteous --- who can 
without  bias/prejudice  identify the true causes  of  the 
symptoms-of-distress; while the "doctors"  present include 
those  people  who  created the stress which  led  to  the 
symptoms-of-distress?   Then,  what kinds of people can be 
trusted to be open,  honest,  and free of bias?    How are 
they    to    be   identified   with   any    degree    of 
confidence/certainty.      Who   is  to  articulate    the  
proper procedure of identification ---  without  prejudice 
or  bias?    What  are the  signs   of  qualification  for 
identifying  such  transcendent people?   On the basis  of 
what  authority?   How can   we  get  out  of  this  cycle  
of   self-referential questions? 
                                                                                                                               
                         (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in      
                    (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy)  
                                                                                                                               
==========================================================