This is http://www.essayz.com/b0302242.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %CLARITY CLEAR ARTICULATION COSMOLOGY MYTHOLOGY 030224 %COSMOLOGY STORIES PARABLES POINTERS STATEMENT GOD 030224 %BELIEF DOCTRINE CONFESSION SONGS BALLADS DANCES 030224 %DRAMAS PLAYS CARTOON SYMPHONIES ABSOLUTE TRUTH 030224 %TRUE TRANSCEND HUMANS VALUABLE HELPFUL CONTAIN 030224 %WITHIN BOX THINKING HOLD CONTROL DOMINATE WAYS 030224 We need greater clarity regarding how to judge the values of complementary: cosmologies, mythologies, myths, stories, parables, pointers, statements, beliefs, doctrines, confessions, songs, ballads, dances, dramas, plays, cartoons, symphonies, etc. It is misleading to demand to know if they are "true" or "false" in some absolute sense which transcends human beings in particular and/or in general. Complementary kinds of questions need to be formulated, asked, and responded to: 1. How valuable/helpful are they to each different person? Maybe words other than "valuable" and "helpful" need to be used here as well. 2. Are they valuable/helpful in different "ways" to different people; not just to different "degrees"? 3. Do they "contain" that which is valuable and/or helpful; or do they point-to or call-attention-to that which is valuable and/or helpful? 4. Can people be "in control of" some of the realities being considered here; all of them; none of them? 5. Must there be proper "authorities" in charge of the use of the realities being considered here; to be sure that they are not "improperly used" or "abused"? Who is to say who such "authorities" should be? 6. Given the records we have about major religious teachers who have founded and guided the development of the major religious traditions within "Spaceship Earth"; what do those records suggest might have been the responses of such persons to the above questions? What additional questions and suggestions might they have to offer? 7. Are complementary people likely to respond in different ways to the above questions --- depending upon how preoccupied they are with issues of: control, domination, authority, exclusivity, dichotomization, etc? 8. What kinds of people do (or will) want to be in control of how other people respond to the above kinds of questions? Why? For any good reasons? For any reasons which should NOT be honored, respected and/or supported? Who is qualified to say without serious bias? (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================