This is http://www.essayz.com/b0204111.htm         
Previous-Essay      <== This-Essay ==>     Following-Essay
Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words.
{Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.}
==========================================================
 %GLOBAL DILEMMA GUIDE MANAGE CONTROL RELATIONSHIPS+020411
   %KEY ROLES THINK TALK WORDS CONCEPTS ROLE MODELS+020411
%ATTITUDES ASSUMPTIONS QUESTIONS BELIEFS DOUBTS SIN+020411
   %PARADIGM SYSTEMS ANALYSIS PREJUDICE PROFESSIONS+020411
   %BEING CHARGE CONTROL COMMAND LOYALTY TRUE TRUST 020411
                                                          
      There is a global dilemma in regards to how to think
and  talk about such things as guiding,  managing,  and or
controlling human relationships:  Which of the three words
"guiding", "managing" and/or "controlling" should play the
key role in the thinking and/or talking?                  
                                                          
      1.   Are  the  above three key words  the  only such
words   which   should   play key roles  in  thinking  and
talking?    If the answer is "no"; then what other similar
and/or  related words/concepts would also play key  roles?
If "yes", why so?                                         
                                                          
      2.   What  are  the related  attitudes,  assumptions
and/or    beliefs  which  should  play  key roles  in  our
thinking,   talking and behaviors related to dealing  with
dysfunctional human relationships?                        
                                                          
      3.    What   are   the  inter-related   professional
paradigms  which  should  play key roles in  dealing  with
dysfunctional  relationships:   exact  sciences,    social
sciences,   humanities,  the arts,  literature,  religion,
politics, engineering, etc?                               
                                                          
      4.    What various kinds of leaders should be relied
upon  to guide our efforts?    What personality types  and
characters  should  be trusted more than  others?     What
kinds should be regarded  with careful suspicion?     What
kinds  should  be trusted enthusiastically and/or  without
concern?                                                  
                                                          
      5.   What  are  the essential  foundations  for both
personal  and  communal integrity for all kinds of people?
Are  there any essential foundations for both personal and
communal   integrity for ALL KINDS of people?  How do   we
avoid making tragic false assumptions in how we  formulate
and frame the key questions in all of these regards?      
                                                          
      6.  Who  should be "in charge"   of making sure that
people do not make mistakes?     In punishing those people
and  leaders  who  do  make  major  mistakes?   Are  these
questions biased?                                         
                                                                                                                               
                         (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in      
                    (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy)  
                                                                                                                               
==========================================================