blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/a9511191.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %FREE FLOW OPEN HONEST ACCURATE INFORMATION TRUST+951119 %RISK VULNERABILITY SECURITY DEFENSIVE BELIEF GAME+951119 %ASSUMPTION CONVICTION COMMITMENT POWER COLLUSIVE+951119 %MUTUAL SELF DECEPTION ADDICTION CODEPENDENCE LOVE+951119 %REFLEXIVE OBJECTIVE MEANINGFUL SIGNIFICANCE LIVE 951119 There are often inhibitions to the free flow of open, honest and accurate reflexive information between people who seek to offer and receive such information in mutual, balanced and charitable dialogue. Such inhibitions may originate in the histories and experiences of the people who are directly involved---or in the histories and experiences of others who are not directly involved, but who seek to be involved so as to control the flow of reflexive information. People may fear to offer to each other any meaningfully open, honest and accurate reflexive information---because of the vulnerability and risks which are entailed in doing so---or because of the risks which they EXPECT will be entailed in doing so. People may fear to receive from each other any open, honest and accurate reflexive information---because it may undermine cherished beliefs, assumptions, convictions and/or commitments which they are unwilling to let go of- --or because of a FEAR that it may undermine cherished beliefs, assumptions, convictions and/or commitments which they are unwilling to let go of. People who are not currently involved in the free flow of open, honest and accurate reflexive information between people who seek to offer and receive such information in mutual, balanced and charitable dialogue--- may seek to become involved and to control such a flow of information out of fear that such an information flow will undermine the powers they believe they have by virtue of their collusive games of mutual self deception. In each instance of the inhibition of the free flow of open, honest, and accurate reflexive information between people who seek to offer and receive such information in mutual, balanced and charitable dialogue--- we need to consider carefully in reasoned ways all the available evidence which may help us to recognize whether the inhibition will on the whole promote or undermine personal and communal integrity. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================