blog traffic analysis
This is http://www.essayz.com/a9004272.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %NON-TECHNICAL ESCAPE TRANSCEND TECHNOCRACY ADDICT 900427 To the technocrat who is thoroughly addicted to the attitudes of the technocratic society it appears that all meaningful questions and publications involve mathematics and computations. It is easy for technocrats to feel that if a publication does not involve complex mathematics it is not dealing with important questions. Technocratic editors of specialized scientific journals are likely to regard with disdain all articles which are submitted without the expected amount of sophisticated mathematics. Such attitudes help to protect the dishonest collusive games of the technocratic society. Those who are not trapped in collusive games of mutual self deception can easily see that the process of transcending the dishonesty of the games will naturally not involve the compulsive use of mathematics, and will often involve extensive consideration of the reflexive inter-relationships between assumptions, questions, perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs. Such considerations may be philosophical and theological, they are not mathematical in nature. Any attempt to assure that they appear to involve mathematical considerations is dominated by technocratic games of mutual self deception. The perpetual crisis in science education of the 1900's is the result of collusive games of mutually deceptive technocrats. The process of transcending that perpetual crisis will of necessity involve less mathematics than the prisoners of it expect will be necessary for solving the pseudo-problems which they perceive as the essence of the crisis. Non- technocrats need to be careful that they do not fall into playing the collusive games of mutual self deception by showing uncritical respect for technical experts who are dishonest about fundamental issues because of their addiction to pure research. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================