This is http://www.essayz.com/a8605022.htm Previous-Essay <== This-Essay ==> Following-Essay Click HERE on this line to find essays via Your-Key-Words. {Most frequent wordstarts of each essay will be put here.} ========================================================== %DISCOVERING YOUR COLLUSION 860502 Liberation entails the discovery by participants of their own unknown taboos and collusions. Such liberation is the essence of a liberal education which entails the educement of unknown taboos and collusions. Participants in a collusion unknowingly agree to deceive themselves and others, and thus obscure, confuse, repress and otherwise make unknown the nature of the collusions and supportive taboos in which they participate. They are the victims of the alienation occasioned by the rejections which enforce the rules of their collusive games of mutual self deception. Those people who refuse to participate in the games o mutual self deception with enthusiasm are regarded as threats to the continuity of the participants' ground of being, and so must be rejected; i.e., placed outside the boundaries of communication, of community. Lack of proper enthusiasm can be the first sign of potential treason and so the grounds for rejection, ex-communication. Better be safe than sorry! It is not safe to discuss the grounds for rejection because such discussion might expose the lack of integrity in the unspoken and unknown rules of the collusive games of mutual self deception. Given the nature of the tacit rules of the games it i virtually impossible for participants to discover that they are participants in games of mutual self deception. How can they realize that the games are real? Can a scientific case be made that the games are real? Is their reality only in their realization? Or are there ways to say meaningfully that participants in the games are victims of their games and need to be liberated from their mutual self deception? What is ultimately real when the reality is essentially subjective in nature? In what sense is a collusion which is unknown to participants in the collusion (by virtue of their participation in the collusion) a reality? Traditional scientific methodology can not verify the reality of a subjective reality which does not meet scientists' standards for reality because of scientists' rules of evidence which reject subjective perceptions and intimate personal communications. Scientists are not free to treat seriously any subjective perceptions and intimate personal communications which transcend their rituals of objective manipulation. (c) 2005 by Paul A. Smith in (On Being Yourself, Whole and Healthy) ==========================================================